Risky Business by KCIC

KCIC.com
  • HOME
  • CLAIMS ADMIN
  • DISPUTE RESOLUTION
  • INSURANCE & RISK
  • TECH
  • CULTURE

Presenting at Perrin: Updated Asbestos Litigation Data

March 18, 2016 By Michelle Potter Leave a Comment

PerrinConferenceBlogImage150x150I spoke on a panel to start off Perrin Conferences’ Cutting-Edge Issues in Asbestos Litigation Conference in Beverly Hills, Calif., on March 14. Besides myself, the panel — titled “The Top Emerging Trends in 2016 Asbestos Litigation” — included both plaintiff and defense attorneys, as well as insurers. Our goal was to begin the two-day conference by highlighting what we’re seeing across the asbestos litigation landscape today.

My part of the presentation was to share amended findings from KCIC’s “Asbestos Litigation: 2015 Year in Review” report, which we released last month. The report focused on how many defendants are being named on asbestos lawsuits, who is filing them, and where are they being filed.

It’s important to note that the report reflected our data through Feb. 1, 2016. However, for the conference, I presented data updated through Feb. 29, 2016. As a result of the lag between filing and defendants actually receiving service, we received about 500 complaints in the month of February that were filed with the court in December 2015. The influx of complaints was mainly due to non-malignant cases filed in Middlesex, Mass., by The Ferraro Law Firm and in Baltimore City, Md., by The Law Office of Peter Angelos. Those updated numbers reveal the following:

Defendant Companies
In 2015, the median number of defendant companies named on asbestos complaints was 54, which is up by 8% from 2014 filings. The panel really grabbed onto this statistic and discussed why so many companies are named when the vast majority of them end up getting dismissed. The insurer argued that the plaintiff’s attorneys have a duty to perform some due diligence before filing, making sure they name the companies that should legitimately be named. The insurer added that it is unnecessary to force so many companies to spend time and money filing answers to lawsuits that just get dismissed. On the other hand, the plaintiff counsel on the panel said that, indeed, it is necessary to name all the defendants that could have a stake in the case. The attorney argued that when a case is filed, it’s impossible to know that the majority of the defendants are going to be dismissed; they want to make sure their bases are covered if/when a defendant is identified in a deposition.

Jurisdiction
We also discussed the fact that Madison County, Ill., continues to be the nation’s mesothelioma filing capital. In fact, Madison County saw 48 percent of all mesothelioma lawsuits in 2015. The defense attorneys on the panel argued that 99 percent of those cases do not belong in Madison County — that the plaintiff was never exposed there, nor did the defendant do significant business there (see my recent blog post about personal jurisdiction). The plaintiff counsel countered that the cases are filed properly. The panel also discussed the recent trend in verdicts — the number of cases going to trial decreased in 2015, and the panel was unsure if the 2015 trial figures are an anomaly or a trend. As we continue through 2016, we will get a better sense of whether or not we are actually seeing a trend.

Filing Trends
The panel also discussed the decline in asbestos-related mesothelioma cases. The data does not show a decline in overall mesothelioma filings, but the panel argued that non-asbestos mesothelioma is on the rise. It will be interesting to see how the science continues to develop to determine which mesothelioma is caused by asbestos and which may not be. Current thinking is that there are two types of mesothelioma — stomach and lung — and one is asbestos-related and one is not. It will be interesting to see what changes and what stays the same in asbestos litigation throughout 2016, and then what “emerging trends” we’ll be talking about at next year’s conference.

Other Risky Business Posts by KCIC

More Details on the Two Recent Berkshire Deals KCIC Consultant Mary Elizabeth Mullins contributed to this post.In my February 10 blog post “The Hunger for Float: Two New Berkshire Deals”, I not...
My Reason for Running: Pediatric Mental Health I announced in January that I have registered for the 2018 World Marathon Challenge, a grueling endurance event that has competitors running seven mar...
Confronting the Present and Glimpsing the Future a... Last month, I headed back to the desert to attend the annual ABA Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee CLE Seminar in Tucson, Ariz. As always, it wa...
KCIC’s 2016 Asbestos Report Now Available I had the pleasure of attending the Perrin “Cutting-Edge Issues on Asbestos Litigation” conference in Beverly Hills last week with two of my KCIC co...

Filed Under: Dispute Resolution, Insurance & Risk Tagged With: Asbestos, asbestos lawsuits, asbestos litigation, data, defendant companies, insurance, jurisdiction, Litigation, Madison County, mesothelioma, mesothelioma lawsuits, plaintiff, Risk, trends

Michelle Potter

About Michelle Potter

Michelle Potter has more than 15 years of experience providing accounting- and financial-related consulting services to policyholder clients and their legal counsel on a variety of insurance-related issues. She oversees KCIC’s consulting teams, client relationships, and the development of our claims administration and product liability services.

Meet the Contributors

Jonathan TerrellJonathan Terrell
Dan SnyderDan Snyder
Nick SochurekNick Sochurek
Megan ShockleyMegan Shockley
Carrie ScottCarrie Scott
Michelle PotterMichelle Potter
Andrew PetryszakAndrew Petryszak
Chris MonahanChris Monahan
Elizabeth HankeElizabeth Hanke
Nancy GutzlerNancy Gutzler
Chris CrookChris Crook

ARCHIVES

QUICK LINKS

CLAIMS ADMIN
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
INSURANCE & RISK
TECHNOLOGY
CULTURE
KCIC.COM
LinkedIn Icon Twitter Icon

Tag Cloud

insurance Risk Asbestos asbestos litigation claims administration Risk Management Consulting Litigation Claims Technology Berkshire Hathaway claims management Culture product liability KCIC KCIC Cares mesothelioma Insurance Coverage Corporate Insurance company culture data KCIC Culture

CONTACT

KCIC
733 10th Street, NW
Suite 3001
Washington, DC 20001

P: 202-772-2300
F: 202-772-2333
E: contact@kcic.com

Copyright © 2018 | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Risky Business - KCIC.com