Risky Business by KCIC

KCIC.com
  • HOME
  • CLAIMS ADMIN
  • DISPUTE RESOLUTION
  • INSURANCE & RISK
  • TECH
  • CULTURE

Discussing Allocation Complexities at ABA

March 15, 2016 By Nancy Gutzler Leave a Comment

see-you-in-tuscon-next-month-in-post-imageI was able to spend a few days in sunny Arizona for the 2016 ABA Section of Litigation – Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee CLE Conference. It was great to meet up with so many longtime friends and make some new connections as well.

Among the sessions I found interesting was one that included insights from a colleague of mine. Elizabeth Hanke, KCIC Vice President, spoke on the panel “Where the Math Meets the Law: Valuing State Law on Allocation and Related Issues”. She was joined by insurance coverage lawyers Kami E. Quinn of Gilbert LLP and William Um of Kilpatrick Townsend, as well as Stephanie Sciullo, In-House Counsel for MSA The Safety Company.

The panel’s objectives were to demonstrate some of the hidden complexities in allocation issues and provide some practical tips on how to leverage those complexities to the benefit of clients.

The Law and Past Decisions
The initial focus was on the law and past decisions that are used to prepare models of allocation results. The panelists pointed out that the expertise of courts lies in interpreting contractual language and prescribing overarching rules. However, specific applications of math and potential variables that arise under each of these allocation scenarios are not generally an easy subject to translate into legal briefs or opinions. Thus, even in cases where the courts are very specific in their language, sometimes new questions arise even as others are answered.

The panel looked at a few sample formulations of allocation scenarios from around the country and considered what must be resolved before these methodologies can genuinely answer the question, “How much do they owe?”

The panel briefly discussed three different pro-rata allocation methodologies:

Time on the risk to available coverage (State v. Continental Ins. Co., 55 Ca.4th 186, 199 (2012))

Time on the risk strict pro-rata (Boston Gas Company v. Century Indem. Co., 708 F.3d 254, 258 (1st Cir. 2013))

Time and limits (Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Admiral Ins Co., 154 N. J. 312 (1998))

Questions That Arise
While the abovementioned decisions are clear in many areas, they do not address some basic questions that arise in real-life situations.

  • Do policies that are insolvent or that contain exclusions factor into the numerator and/or the denominator of total coverage?
  • What role does policy language play? For example, what if one or more of the policies contains some version of anti-stacking language?
  • What if a policy is canceled before its policy year is complete and a new policy is issued? Does this year then have twice as much coverage, or does the denominator change to 11 from 10?
  • When a ruling refers to pro-rata by annual period (such as in State v. Continental Ins. Co.), it is doing so because, generally speaking, coverage is issued in annual periods or years. However, there are many exceptions to this. Policies can be issued for three years at one time with language in the policy around annual limits, per occurrence limits and aggregate limits. How would such a policy factor into the denominator?
  • When considering time and limits, what happens after the available limits in some years are exhausted? Does that change the denominator used when determining the annual shares? Put another way, is the liability prorated by coverage issued or coverage available at any point in time?
  • How do prior settlements with insurers factor into the calculation?

While these are things we deal with and model on a regular basis at KCIC, it was fun for me to listen to the panel and get very excited about the myriad of options available. The lawyers in the group were enthusiastic about the interpretation of the decisions and the policy language, while being more than happy to turn the implementation of the math involved over to an expert, like Elizabeth, from KCIC.

Other Risky Business Posts by KCIC

More Details on the Two Recent Berkshire Deals KCIC Consultant Mary Elizabeth Mullins contributed to this post.In my February 10 blog post “The Hunger for Float: Two New Berkshire Deals”, I not...
My Reason for Running: Pediatric Mental Health I announced in January that I have registered for the 2018 World Marathon Challenge, a grueling endurance event that has competitors running seven mar...
Confronting the Present and Glimpsing the Future a... Last month, I headed back to the desert to attend the annual ABA Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee CLE Seminar in Tucson, Ariz. As always, it wa...
KCIC’s 2016 Asbestos Report Now Available I had the pleasure of attending the Perrin “Cutting-Edge Issues on Asbestos Litigation” conference in Beverly Hills last week with two of my KCIC co...

Filed Under: Insurance & Risk Tagged With: ABA, insurance allocation, Insurance Coverage, Litigation, models of allocation, pro-rata allocation methodologies

Nancy Gutzler

About Nancy Gutzler

Nancy Gutzler has over 25 years of experience providing financial and litigation support and expert testimony services to clients. She has assisted clients with analysis of claims data, sampling of claims populations, allocation of claims costs to insurance coverage, and development of claims processing procedures and systems. Ms. Gutzler has particular expertise in claims analysis and administration of many types of mass tort claims, especially those related to asbestos personal injury, and has consulted with clients on various issues related to the analysis of large volumes of claims.

Meet the Contributors

Jonathan TerrellJonathan Terrell
Dan SnyderDan Snyder
Nick SochurekNick Sochurek
Megan ShockleyMegan Shockley
Carrie ScottCarrie Scott
Michelle PotterMichelle Potter
Andrew PetryszakAndrew Petryszak
Chris MonahanChris Monahan
Elizabeth HankeElizabeth Hanke
Nancy GutzlerNancy Gutzler
Chris CrookChris Crook

ARCHIVES

QUICK LINKS

CLAIMS ADMIN
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
INSURANCE & RISK
TECHNOLOGY
CULTURE
KCIC.COM
LinkedIn Icon Twitter Icon

Tag Cloud

insurance Risk Asbestos asbestos litigation claims administration Risk Management Consulting Litigation Claims Technology Berkshire Hathaway claims management Culture product liability KCIC KCIC Cares mesothelioma Insurance Coverage Corporate Insurance company culture data KCIC Culture

CONTACT

KCIC
733 10th Street, NW
Suite 3001
Washington, DC 20001

P: 202-772-2300
F: 202-772-2333
E: contact@kcic.com

Copyright © 2018 | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Risky Business - KCIC.com